Guarding Rwanda’s Sovereignty: Lake Kivu Oil and the Threat of External Economic Intervention.



The discovery of oil in Lake Kivu heralds a transformative moment for Rwanda, offering an unprecedented pathway toward economic advancement and energy self-sufficiency. Yet, this milestone brings with it complex challenges rooted in geopolitics and global power dynamics. As the Rwanda Mines, Petroleum, and Gas Board (RMB) unveils the hydrocarbon potential of Lake Kivu, the prospect of international interest looms large—raising concerns about the intentions of foreign powers, particularly under the guise of “humanitarian intervention.” Drawing lessons from Dan Kovalik’s No More War, which critiques the West's historical tendency to cloak economic and strategic motives in the language of democracy and human rights, Rwanda faces a moment of reckoning. Will the Lake Kivu oil reserves propel the nation toward equitable development and global partnerships, or will they expose it to the risks of external interference and exploitation? Rwanda must tread carefully, leveraging its sovereignty, robust legal frameworks, and strategic diplomacy to ensure its natural resources serve its people, rather than becoming a catalyst for destabilization.

The Rwanda Mines, Petroleum and Gas Board, published an update on the oil and gas exploration in Lake Kivu. On January 15, 2025, the Rwanda Mines, Petroleum and Gas Board (RMB) announced significant progress in the exploration of oil and gas within Lake Kivu, a key part of the vast Eastern African Rift Valley system. Between 2021 and 2022, RMB conducted a comprehensive 2D Seismic Survey, which unveiled Lake Kivu’s potential as a hydrocarbon resource hub. The survey findings were remarkable, revealing a basin with a depth of around 3.5 kilometers that shows promising signs of hydrocarbon presence. Moreover, the study identified 13 structural pockets and prospective drilling locations, marking critical steps toward confirming the existence and composition of these resources. Encouraged by these results, RMB is actively seeking partnerships with industry players to advance into the next phases of exploration, development, and eventual production of oil and gas in the Lake Kivu basin. This milestone represents an exciting opportunity for collaboration and innovation in Rwanda’s energy sector.[1]

Article 4 of the constitution of Rwanda stipulates that; The Rwandan State is an independent, sovereign, democratic, social and secular Republic.[2] With the Rwanda Defence Force whose mission as provided by the law is to defend the territorial integrity and the national sovereignty of the Republic[3], this only gives the assurance that the Rwandan natural resources will be at the use and benefit Rwandans while they are protected from external interference for destabilizing the country for their personal interest at it happened in different countries.

While safeguarding the sovereignty and ensuring international cooperation, Rwanda through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, insures dynamic and effective diplomacy. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation promotes and defends the interests of Rwanda and Rwandans at home and abroad, coordinate the country's foreign policy and contribute to a just, safe and progressive world.[4] Not only safeguarding Rwanda’s sovereignty, the government of Rwanda is also ready for cooperation. Rwanda makes sure that it is a country open for business, this means that tricks for manipulations and causing chaos for economic interests gains won’t be possible.  

Looking at Dan Kovalik’s No More War a book which is a compelling critique of the Western world’s approach to international conflict. The book delves into how powerful nations, especially the United States, repeatedly violate international law under the pretext of humanitarian intervention. Kovalik highlights a disturbing pattern: interventions justified as protecting human rights often lead to chaos, suffering, and the violation of the very rights they claim to defend. At the heart of his argument is the notion that these actions are not truly humanitarian. Instead, they are driven by economic interests, such as securing valuable resources, and by strategic goals aimed at maintaining global dominance. Kovalik brings attention to cases like Iraq, Libya, and Syria, where military actions led to widespread devastation, destabilization, and long-term suffering for local populations.[5]

 

Lessons from Libya as the victim of foreign policy and economic development relying on oil

Libya’s journey from an oil-rich nation to one torn apart by conflict is deeply intertwined with global power struggles, foreign interventions, and the pursuit of economic interests. In the 1970s, Libya’s oil industry was dominated by American companies, but after the 1969 coup, the government took steps to nationalize its oil resources, asserting control over this valuable commodity. This shift threatened the balance of global oil markets, particularly for Western powers. Despite the U.S. relying minimally on Libyan oil, it still valued the resource for blending purposes and feared disruptions to its production. However, it wasn’t until the 2011 NATO intervention, led by the Obama administration, that Libya’s fate was dramatically altered. Framed as a humanitarian mission to protect civilians, the intervention aimed at toppling the Gaddafi regime quickly spiraled into chaos. The removal of Gaddafi, instead of ushering in stability, led to a prolonged civil war, as Libya’s tribal divisions and political rivalries fueled a bloody conflict. Foreign powers, including the U.S., Russia, Turkey, and several European nations, became embroiled in a proxy war, each pursuing their own geopolitical and economic agendas. The aftermath has been devastating—thousands of lives lost, millions displaced, and the country fractured beyond recognition. The intervention, once touted as a mission to protect, has instead left a legacy of destruction, reminding the world of the dangerous consequences of masking economic ambitions under the guise of humanitarian aid.

The United States' reliance on oil has significantly shaped its foreign policy and economic development. USA oil history spans three key phases: its emergence as a commodity in the mid-19th century, the geopolitical competition of the post–World War II era, and the deregulation and diversification of the post–Cold War period. The Industrial Revolution, initially powered by coal, saw crude oil rise as an alternative energy source in the mid-1800s. Kerosene, derived from refined crude oil, replaced whale oil for lighting, while advances in drilling in Pennsylvania in 1859 ignited a surge in oil production. The first U.S. refinery was established in 1861, followed by the country's first export of refined oil. Over the next 150 years, oil overtook coal as the primary energy source, bolstering the U.S.'s economic strength. Today, as domestic oil production thrives, attention turns to balancing this growth with global efforts to combat climate change.[6]

 

Libyan oil’s strategic importance to Europe declined after 1969 but remained significant for countries like Germany, Italy, and the UK. The US relied minimally on Libyan oil (less than 3% of imports) but valued it for blending to meet environmental standards. Disruptions to Libya’s 2.3 million barrels per day production would strain global markets. For the US, Libya was important due to $409 million in repatriated profits in 1972 and the potential impact of Libyan nationalizations on broader OPEC agreements. Negotiations between the LARG and US oil companies were tense, with Libya seeking control while US companies, divided in strategy, aimed to protect interests. Libya’s assertive policies risked destabilizing global oil dynamics.[7]

The story of Libya's destruction begins with the Obama administration's 2011 intervention, driven by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's push for regime change. Framed as a humanitarian mission to prevent civilian casualties, the U.S.-led NATO campaign toppled Moammar Gaddafi, a dictator who had ruled Libya with an iron fist for decades. However, his removal unleashed chaos rather than stability. What followed was a descent into prolonged civil war. Libya’s tribal divisions, political rivalries, and the meddling of foreign powers turned the country into a battleground. On one side stands the Government of National Accord (GNA), a weak UN-backed coalition, and on the other, General Khalifa Haftar, a former Gaddafi ally with the backing of several nations, including Russia and Egypt. Outside actors such as Turkey, France, and the UAE have escalated the conflict, turning Libya into a proxy war fueled by foreign ambitions.[8]

The war has devastated Libya's people. Tens of thousands have died, millions have been displaced, and hopes for a peaceful future have withered. Islamist groups and terrorists, including ISIS, have exploited the turmoil, adding to the suffering. Despite official condemnation of foreign interference, hypocrisy abounds. The very nations calling for peace are deeply involved in the conflict, using Libya as a chessboard for their geopolitical aims. Meanwhile, the U.S., having abandoned any coherent strategy, has oscillated between recognizing the GNA and engaging with Haftar. For Libyans, the promise of liberation has turned into a nightmare of instability and violence. The Obama administration may not have intended to wreck Libya for a generation, but its decision to intervene, driven by overconfidence in military solutions, has left an enduring legacy of destruction. This tale serves as a sobering reminder of the far-reaching costs of ill-considered war-making.[9]

 

In the shadow of Libya's chaos, a deeper story unfolds—one of intentions veiled by diplomacy[10] and actions that tell a different tale. It was 2011, and the world watched as Muammar Gaddafi’s regime faced the waves of rebellion ignited by the Arab Spring. The Obama administration declared its mission clearly: protect civilians, establish a no-fly zone, and adhere strictly to the UN Security Council’s resolutions. But beneath the surface of these statements lay a far more ambitious plan. As the first Tomahawk missiles screamed through the Mediterranean skies, striking Gaddafi’s compound, the narrative of limited intervention began to unravel. Official statements denied targeting the dictator, yet the precision of these attacks suggested otherwise. Early and often, the coalition employed decapitation strikes, hoping to dismantle the regime’s leadership under the thin veneer of humanitarian aid.

Rwanda can learn vital lessons from Libya’s experience with foreign intervention and oil dependence. To avoid the same pitfalls, Rwanda should prioritize sovereignty, ensuring full control over its oil resources and preventing external manipulation. It must be cautious of foreign interventions, which can disguise ulterior motives under humanitarian aid and result in unintended consequences, as seen in Libya. Diversifying international partnerships will safeguard against geopolitical manipulation and foster strategic leverage. Establishing a strong legal framework for the oil sector is essential for transparency, fair practices, and preventing corruption. Rwanda should also avoid over-reliance on oil, focusing on long-term development by diversifying its economy and ensuring sustainable growth. Lastly, Rwanda must navigate the geopolitical landscape carefully to avoid becoming a pawn in global power struggles. By following these principles, Rwanda can use its oil wealth responsibly, maintaining sovereignty, fostering economic growth, and protecting national interests from foreign exploitation and conflict.

Rwanda’s experience in protecting rich oil zones

Back in 2021 at the request of Mozambique, Rwanda deployed a 1,000-member contingent of the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and Rwanda National Police (RNP) to Cabo Delgado Province to address terrorism and insecurity. The Joint Force, led by Maj Gen Innocent Kabandana, collaborated with Mozambique’s Armed Defence Forces (FADM) and Southern African Development Community (SADC) forces in their assigned areas of operation. The Rwandan forces aim to restore state authority by conducting combat and security operations while also supporting stabilization and security-sector reforms. During a briefing, RDF Army Chief of Staff Lt Gen Mubarakh Muganga emphasized the importance of upholding RDF values, such as discipline, patriotism, and integrity, while maintaining Rwanda's good reputation through exceptional performance. This deployment reflects the strong bilateral ties between Rwanda and Mozambique, established through agreements signed in 2018. It also aligns with Rwanda’s commitment to the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine and the 2015 Kigali Principles on the Protection of Civilians.[11]

In 2024, Rwanda has sent an additional 2,000 soldiers to Mozambique to address escalating violence linked to Islamic State militants in Cabo Delgado province. This unrest has stalled a $20 billion natural gas project by TotalEnergies SE for three years. The deployment increases Rwanda's forces in the region to over 4,500, complementing troops and police already stationed there since 2021. The violence has intensified this year, raising security concerns as TotalEnergies considers restarting its project. ExxonMobil’s adjacent LNG project is also on hold. According to Rwanda Defence Force spokesman Ronald Rwivanga, the reinforcements aim to expand operational coverage and improve effectiveness, not to replace regional Southern African Development Community (SADC) troops set to exit by mid-July. Rwandan forces have been instrumental in countering militants, including clearing Palma after a deadly attack in 2021.[12]

 

Conclusion

The discovery of oil in Lake Kivu offers Rwanda a pivotal opportunity for economic growth and energy independence, but it also exposes the country to potential external economic and political interference. Drawing on the lessons from past foreign interventions, especially the destructive consequences seen in Libya, Rwanda must remain vigilant in protecting its sovereignty. It is crucial that the country safeguards control over its oil resources, resists foreign manipulations disguised as humanitarian efforts, and diversifies its economy to avoid over-reliance on oil. By adhering to a strong legal framework and fostering transparent, fair international partnerships, Rwanda can navigate this opportunity responsibly, ensuring long-term prosperity without compromising its independence.



[2] Official Gazette n° Special of 04/08/2023, CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA, article 4

[9] IDEM

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

So, you want to be the president.

The concept of ubunywarwanda from a legal & historical perspective.

Rethinking War: The Burden of Conflict on a New Generation