It’s like déjà vu: DRC crisis and how Rwanda is scapegoated.
I’m back again. In this
article, we are going to look again on the situation in the Great lakes region and
how it is affecting us. Us, I mean we Rwandans I can say that, the war in the
DRC has been affecting us directly and indirectly as Rwandans for many years.
Now with the new chapter that unfolded in the beginning of this year, it
feels like a déjà vu.
The crisis in the Great
Lakes region is once again unfolding in a familiar and frustrating pattern. For
us Rwandans, the ongoing conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
has had direct and indirect consequences for many years. The latest developments
in early 2025 feel like a repetition of past events, a cycle that seems
never-ending.
Rwanda and the DRC share
a complex and unstable relationship, often alternating between moments of
cooperation and hostility. Every time armed conflicts arise due to the
discrimination against Kinyarwanda-speaking Congolese, the DRC government
quickly shifts blame to Rwanda. This strategy serves as a convenient
distraction from their own internal governance failures and the systemic
marginalization of certain communities.
For those familiar with
the history of this conflict, this is nothing new. Having grown up in Gisenyi,
a border town adjacent to Goma, I have witnessed firsthand the deep connections
between the two cities. Thousands of Rwandans and Congolese cross the Gisenyi-Goma
border daily for trade, work, and family visits, particularly at "Petite
Barrière." The people share cultural ties, yet political tensions between
the two nations continue to fuel instability in the region.
When a crisis erupts in
the DRC, Rwandans often react with a weary sense of déjà vu. The same
accusations resurface, blaming Rwanda for internal conflicts that stem from the
DRC’s own failures in governance and security management.
One of the latest
developments in this ongoing saga is the legal case brought by the DRC against
Rwanda at the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights. On August 21, 2023,
the DRC submitted an application alleging serious human rights violations by Rwanda.
The case argues that Rwanda has breached multiple fundamental rights protected
under international law, including: The right to life and physical integrity; Protection
from slavery, human trafficking, and torture; The right to security, liberty,
and justice. (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO V. REPUBLIC OF RWANDA APPLICATION
No. 007/2023CASE SUMMARY).[1]
This legal move is part
of a broader pattern in which the DRC seeks to externalize its problems rather
than addressing the root causes of its instability. Instead of tackling the
long-standing ethnic tensions and governance challenges within its borders, the
DRC government continues to place the blame on Rwanda, fueling diplomatic
tensions and deepening divisions.
While Rwanda has
consistently denied involvement in the DRC’s internal affairs, the accusations
persist. The real victims of this political blame game are the civilians on
both sides of the border, who suffer from the consequences of prolonged
instability. The ongoing crisis calls for genuine dialogue and regional
cooperation rather than finger-pointing and legal battles that do little to
address the realities on the ground.
On 2nd
February 2025 - Rwanda rejected the accusations against the Rwanda[2] Defence Force (RDF) made
in the statement of the Extraordinary Summit of the Southern African
Development Community (SADC) held on 31 January 2025. The RDF defends Rwanda’s
borders from threats and protects civilians; it does not attack civilians.
SADC has deployed an
offensive force, SAMIDRC, to support the war of the Government of DRC against
its own people – the M23 and the members of their community – many of whom have
fled as refugees to Rwanda and throughout the region. The Government of the DRC
is also bent on attacking Rwanda and overthrowing its government, as has been
repeatedly and publicly stated by President Tshisekedi. It is clear that
SAMIDRC, together with coalition partners that include the Burundian armed
forces, the FDLR, and European mercenaries, are central to the conflict and
should not be there because they are adding to the problems that already
existed.
The argument that SAMIDRC
was invited by the Government of the DRC is rendered void by the fact that they
are there to fight the citizens of that country and effectively bring war to
Rwanda.
Recent information coming
from Goma on what has been discovered, and the documentary evidence of attack
preparations planned together with the foreign forces fighting in eastern DRC,
including the FDLR, indicate that combat objectives were not limited to
defeating M23, but also attacking Rwanda. Rwanda has consistently advocated for
a political solution to the ongoing conflict and welcomes the proposed joint
summit of the East African Community and SADC.
On 13 March 2025, the
Extraordinary Summit of the Heads of State and Government[3] of the Southern African
Development Community (SADC) was held to deliberate on the security situation
in the DRC. The summit, chaired by President Emmerson Dambudzo Mnangagwa of
Zimbabwe, made a significant decision to terminate the mandate of SAMIDRC and
initiate a phased withdrawal of its troops from the DRC.
The summit reaffirmed its
commitment to supporting peace and security in the DRC, in line with the SADC
Mutual Defence Pact of 2003, emphasizing the need for a political and
diplomatic solution involving all stakeholders, including state and non-state
actors, military and non-military entities. Furthermore, the summit reiterated
the decision made during the joint meeting of the East African Community (EAC)
and SADC to merge the Luanda and Nairobi peace processes while expanding the
number of facilitators to enhance the peace-building efforts.
This development
underscores the ineffectiveness of SAMIDRC’s intervention and the recognition
that a military solution is not viable for the region’s long-term stability.
Instead, dialogue and cooperation remain the key pathways to resolving the
crisis in the DRC and ensuring regional security.
Conclusion.
The ongoing crisis in the
Great Lakes region, particularly in the DRC, continues to follow a familiar and
frustrating pattern. Once again, Rwanda is unfairly scapegoated for deep-rooted
governance failures and ethnic tensions within the DRC. The repeated
accusations against Rwanda, rather than addressing the real issues at play,
serve as a political distraction that prolongs instability and suffering for
civilians on both sides of the border.
However, recent
developments—such as the termination of SAMIDRC’s mandate and the push for a
political solution—offer a glimmer of hope. The recognition that a military
approach cannot resolve this crisis is a step in the right direction. Now, the
focus must shift to genuine diplomatic engagement, inclusive dialogue, and
sustainable peace efforts. Only through cooperation and regional commitment can
the Great Lakes region break free from this cycle of conflict and move toward
lasting stability.
Comments
Post a Comment