Addressing Medical Malpractice in Rwanda: Challenges and Legal Implications.
Medical
malpractice occurs when a healthcare professional neglects to provide
appropriate treatment, take appropriate action, or gives substandard treatment
that causes harm, injury, or death to a person.[1]
The
Rwanda Medical and Dental Council, defines medical malpractice as a
professional negligence by act or omission by a health care provider in which
the treatment provided falls below the accepted standard of practice in the
medical community and causes injury or death to the patient with most cases
involving medical error.[2]
Medical
malpractice allegations in Rwanda primarily originate from the Ministry of
Health (MoH).[3]
However, a significant challenge arises because not all cases occurring across
the country are registered by the Rwanda Medical and Dental Council (RMDC).
This discrepancy results in many cases going unreported or unaddressed. A large
proportion of allegations—approximately one-third—relate to Obstetrics and
Gynecology. These cases often stem from inadequate follow-up after medical
procedures such as induction, leading to complications that could have been
prevented with closer monitoring.
Several
issues Contributes to Medical Malpractice in Rwanda, among them;
Incompetent
Medical and Paramedical Staff; Some
healthcare professionals lack the necessary skills and training to provide
adequate medical care, increasing the risk of errors and malpractice.
Poor
Documentation of Patients’ Files; Inadequate
record-keeping leads to difficulties in tracking patient history, making it
challenging to provide consistent and informed medical treatment.
Lack
of Standardized Procedures; The
absence of clear and uniform medical guidelines contributes to inconsistencies
in patient care, leaving room for errors and negligence.
Lack
of Administrative and Disciplinary Measures by Employers; Some healthcare institutions fail
to enforce accountability among their staff, allowing medical errors to persist
without proper corrective actions.
Frequent
Appeals Against Council Decisions; Many
medical practitioners challenge the RMDC’s rulings, which delays justice and
weakens the effectiveness of disciplinary actions.
Legal
and Institutional Dilemmas; The
RMDC faces accusations in both administrative and civil courts, highlighting
the legal challenges in regulating medical professionals. A significant dilemma
arises from conflicting perceptions of the Council’s role.
Medical
Practitioners (MPs) often feel that the RMDC exists primarily to punish them
rather than to protect and support the medical profession.
Article 27 of the LAW Nº44/2012 OF 14/01/2013
ON THE ORGANISATION, FUNCTIONING AND COMPETENCE OF THE MEDICAL AND DENTAL
COUNCIL, stipulates that; disciplinary measures on medical doctors and dentists
which can be taken by the organs of the Council are; warning; reprimand; temporary
suspension of practice for a period not exceeding six (6) months; and removal
from the register of members of the
Council. The disciplinary measures for medical doctors and dentists are
carefully structured to reflect the seriousness of their faults. For minor
offenses that do not threaten patient life or tarnish the dignity of the
medical profession, the Bureau of the National Council Board is authorized to
issue a warning or a reprimand. In instances where the fault may pose a risk to
the patient’s life or the integrity of the profession, the Board has the power
to impose a temporary suspension of practice for up to six months, with the
understanding that such cases must also be reported to the Minister of Health.
In more severe situations, where a practitioner’s conduct is considered
fundamentally incompatible with the responsibilities of their profession, the
Board may decide to remove the individual from the register, and this action is
communicated publicly. To ensure fairness, serious offenses and their
corresponding disciplinary measures are clearly outlined in the internal rules
and regulations of the Council, and before any action is taken, the medical
doctor or dentist in question is given the opportunity to be heard by the
appropriate disciplinary organ.[4] Sadly, this article is not
much in use due to existing cases already brought to court. One of them is NYIRABATESI
Laurence v. KING FAISAL HOSPITAL.
NYIRABATESI
Laurence sued King Faisal Hospital for medical negligence after a delayed C-[5]section in 2003, which
caused severe complications, including a fistula and permanent disability. The
Gasabo Intermediate Court initially ruled in her favor, awarding 20,000,000
Rwandan Francs in compensation. The hospital appealed, arguing lack of jurisdiction
and insufficient evidence, and the High Court overturned the decision, claiming
the case should have been filed in the Administrative Court since the hospital
became a government institution in 2011. NYIRABATESI appealed to the Supreme
Court, and the case moved to the Court of Appeal in 2018. Medical experts
confirmed that the delay and surgical errors caused her permanent injury. The
Court of Appeal ruled in her favor, ordering the hospital to pay 28,000,000 Frw
for damages, 1,500,000 Frw for legal fees, and 500,000 Frw for court costs,
with the decision delivered on July 19, 2019.
Conclusion
While
the legal framework for addressing medical malpractice exists in Rwanda,
challenges like underreporting and inefficiencies in enforcement persist. The
RMDC’s role is crucial, but further reforms are needed to strengthen
accountability. The NYIRABATESI case exemplifies these systemic challenges.
[1] Medical
News Today, ‘’ What is medical malpractice?’’- https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/248175#what_does_a_malpractice_case_involve
on 23 February 2025
[2] Prof.
Justin WANE, ‘’Medical Litigation.’’ https://www.rmdc.rw/IMG/pdf/Medical_Litigation_Presentation_KMA.pdf
on 23 February 2025
[3]
IDEM
[4] Official
Gazette nº 02 of 14/01/2013, LAW Nº44/2012 OF 14/01/2013 ON THE ORGANISATION,
FUNCTIONING AND COMPETENCE OF THE MEDICAL AND DENTAL COUNCIL, Article 27.
[5] URUBANZA
No RCAA 00073/2018/CA, URUKIKO RW’UBUJURIRE RURI I KIGALI, RUHABURANISHIRIZA
IMANZA Z’IMBONEZAMUBANO, RUHAKIRIJE MU RUHAME URUBANZA No RCAA 00073/2018/CA
NONE KU WA 19/07/2019
Comments
Post a Comment